Legal Opinion
Edmond v. Foisey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 23, 2008No. AC 29077PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant Dawn Foisey 1 appeals from the judgment of contempt rendered in favor of the plaintiff, John Edmond III. Specifically, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) violated her right to due process when it failed to afford her a full hearing on the issues raised in the plaintiffs motions for contempt, (2) imposed a punitive sanction in violation of Practice Book § 1-21A, 2 (3) improperly found her in contempt and (4) improperly enforced the parties’ stipulated judgment by a sanction for contempt. 3 We agree with the defendant’s first and second claims and,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Przekopski v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Avery v. MedinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Dickinson v. DickinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Fiorillo v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Puff v. PuffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.