Legal Opinion

Sagalyn v. Pederson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2013No. AC 34172PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) provides in relevant part: “Unless and to the extent that the decree [dissolving a marriage] precludes modification ... an order requiring either party to maintain life insurance for the other party or a minor child of the parties may, at any time thereafter, be continued, set aside, altered or modified by the court upon a showing of a substantial change in the circumstances of either party . . . .’’In this case, the trial court terminated the defendant’s obligation to maintain term life insurance for the benefit of his children because he could…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Afkari-Ahmadi v. Fotovat-AhmadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Crowley v. CrowleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Dougan v. DouganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Damon v. DamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gill v. Brescome Barton, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Hammond v. HammondConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API