Legal Opinion

McPheeters v. McMahon

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1933No. Docket No. 8739PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMSTOCK, J., pro tem.

Respondent brought this action on April 1, 1932, against the appellant and certain other persons, to secure an injunction prohibiting them using or conducting certain premises in the city of Modesto as a dance hall, or giving dances therein or permitting them to be so used.

The court below issued a temporary restraining order upon the verified complaint, without notice. An order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be granted was issued, returnable April 9, 1932. On April 8, 1932, the defendant, Teddy McMahon, appellant herein, served and filed a general…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Arrington v. LiscomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Nev. Cty. & Sacramento Canal Co. v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Williams v. Blue Bird Laundry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Morton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Paramount Pictures Corporation v. HoldenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. City of Industry v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API