Legal Opinion

Thorne v. Squier

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933No. Docket No. 103, Calendar No. 36,989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

In 1913, the city of Battle Creek adopted a commission form of government, headed by a mayor and four commissioners. It had theretofore been governed by a mayor and common council. On April 5, 1932, immediately following the spring election and prior to the canvassing of the votes, the retiring commission held a regular meeting, at which Daniel E. Squier was elected city clerk for a two-year term by a unanimous vote, notwithstanding Commissioner Hoyt’s protest against the exercise of the power of appointment by a body that was about to go out of office. Commissioner Hoyt also explained that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. State ex rel. Board of PoliceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Biggs v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1889

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Township of Bloomfield v. BeardsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. HagemeisterNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Burke v. SchmidtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re Vermont Fiberglass, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1984
  5. Boisvert v. County of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API