Legal Opinion

Biggs v. McBride

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1889PublishedCited by 66 opinions

Appeal from Marion County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This proceeding was instituted by the plaintiff, claiming to be one of the railroad commissioners of the state, against the secretary of state, to compel him by writ of mandamus to di’aw a warrant upon the state treasury for the sum of $277.77, being the amount claimed as plaintiff’s salary up to the date of the filing of the petition for the writ.

The petition alleges, in substance, that George W. McBride is the duly elected, qualified, and acting secretary of state of the state of Oregon, and is, by virtue* of said office, the auditor of public accounts; that your petitioner is one of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dullam v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Page v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
  3. Gentile v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. People Ex Rel. Munday v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Baker v. ComptonTexas Supreme Court · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re Willow CreekOregon Supreme Court · 1914

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API