Legal Opinion

Township of Bloomfield v. Beardslee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 51, Calendar 46,762PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This case involves a zoning controversy. The defendants own gravel-hearing property in the township of Bloomfield and they wish to develop it commercially. The trouble is that it is in an area zoned for residential purposes. The township, hence, seeks to restrain the operation. The owners, by cross bill, attempt to enjoin the township’s interference with their mining operation. The trial court upheld the ordinance, and the defendants (who will, hereafter be referred to as the owners) took a general appeal. Thus the bare bones of the controversy. Other facts will be filled in as we go on.

Upon…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. West Bros. Brick Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  5. City of North Muskegon v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gackler Land Co. v. Yankee Springs TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bevan v. Brandon TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fredal v. ForsterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API