Legal Opinion

Lane v. Grange Mutual Companies

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1989No. 88-949PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

An action on a contract is subject to a fifteen-year statute of limitations. R.C. 2305.06. However, an insurance policy may limit the time for an action on the contract to less than fifteen years if a reasonable time for suit is provided. Colvin v. Globe American Cas. Co. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 293, 23 O.O. 3d 281, 432 N.E. 2d 167; Duriak v. Globe American Cas. Co. (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 70, 28 OBR 168, 502 N.E. 2d 620, reaffirming Col-vin.

To reduce the time for suit provided by the statute of limitations, an insurance policy must be written in terms that are clear and unambiguous to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Faruque v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Buckeye Union Insurance v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. American Financial Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Andersen v. Highland House Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. St. Marys Foundry, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Shirley J. Thomas v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Retail Ventures, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API