Kaeding v. Joachimsthal
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to enjoin summary proceedings to recover the possession of land. Defendant appeals. Decree affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
The complainants file a bill to enjoin proceedings before a circuit court commissioner to obtain possession of premises claimed as a homestead by complainants. The defendant claims title under an execution sale, the validity of which seems to depend upon this question of homestead.
Mrs. Kaeding was carrying on the millinery business in '1883, when the premises were purchased by complainants for a home. In December, 1884, they occupied the premises. In 1885, they moved to another part of the city (Detroit) to resume the millinery business, owing to the inability of the husband to work. They…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Hoffman v. BuschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by11 opinions
- Japp v. Sapulpa State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kimball v. SalisburyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Burkhardt v. James Walker & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Corey v. WaldoMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Hitchcock v. MisnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.