Hoffman v. Buschman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Mitchell, J.) Ejectment. Defendants Bernhard Buschman and HenryAhrens bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
Plaintiff brought ejectment to obtain. *539■possession of the undivided half of certain lands, described as follows, viz.: “The S. E. £ of the N. W. i, and the S. W. i of the N. E. of section 34, town 7 north, range 16 east.” The case was tried without a jury, and written findings of fact and law were filed.
The brief of counsel for the appellants relies upon two points to reverse the judgment:
1. The wife of Bernhard Buschman was not made a party.
2. The sale under the execution, upon which plaintiff claims title, was void.
Exceptions upon each of the findings of fact and law were filed. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Amphlett v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Blair v. ComptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by15 opinions
- Power v. LarabeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Kaeding v. JoachimsthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Craig v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Northwestern Mortgage Trust Co. v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.