Legal Opinion

Hitchcock v. Misner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Russell, J. Bill by Joseph A. Hitchcock against Porter P. Misner and others to set aside an attachment levy. From a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a proceeding to set aside an attachment levy made by defendants upon one-half of a city lot in Muskegon. The record shows that the attachment was made October 5, 1895, by creditors of a firm of which complainant was a member. This half lot, which was known as “No. 12 Muskegon Avenue,” was bought by complainant, who was then á married man, in 1890. It was occupied by himself and family for about 3£ years. About a year and a half before the levy, complainant and his family moved to No. 53 Muskegon avenue, into a house *181then occupied by his father and his family, and continued to reside…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BuschmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kaeding v. JoachimsthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Myers v. WeaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. James Walker & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Davis v. NeihardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Van Kovering v. EggebeenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API