Legal Opinion

Anamoose National Bank v. Dockter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note.

The defendants in their answer admit the making of the note, but allege that the note was given for the accommodation of the plaintiff bank, and was without consideration. It was further alleged, that the president of the bank represented to the defendants, that the note of one Dockter was long past due, that the bank examiner had ordered it charged off the bank assets, or fixed up in some manner satisfactory to the bank examiner, and at the said time, promised and agreed with the defendants, that they would never be called upon to pay of settle for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Vallely v. DevaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Haddock, Blanchard Co. v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Quincy Trust Co. v. WoodburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. First National Bank v. StephenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Goldammer-Cranna-Weaver Co. v. PriceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gallagher v. Tappen State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API