Rankin v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas City
Supreme Court of the United States
■ ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This suit was brought by the receiver of the Capitol National Bank of Guthrie, Oklahoma Territory, which we shall call the Guthrie Bank, to recover the amount of an alleged deposit in the City National Bank of Kansas City, Missouri, which we shall call the City Bank. At a trial without a jury in tjhe Circuit Court the facts were found and judgment was given for the defendant, which judgment was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Cherry, Receiver, v. City National Bank, 144 Fed. Rep. 587; S. C., 75 C. C. A. 343. We give an abridgment of the findings of the Circuit Court.
The bank…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Cherry v. City Nat. Bank of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Generes v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
3Cited by51 opinions
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Laurent v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Ball v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Peterson v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.