Legal Opinion

Vallely v. Devaney

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1923PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BiRdzell, J\

This is an appeal from a judgment for the defendants and from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial in three consolidated actions upon as many promissory notes. By stipulation two additional actions, each on separate notes, abide the result of these cases. The facts are as follows: In 1918, one W. L. Dodson purchased a large herd of cattle at some distant point and took them to.Cavalier county. In connection with the purchase he had given his'note to the St. Paul Cattle Loan Company of South St. Paul.for $28,000.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. State Bank of Moore v. ForsythMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pauly v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1895
  4. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. German-American Finance Corp. v. Merchants & Manufacturers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API