Legal Opinion
Quincy Trust Co. v. Woodbury
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 1, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The defendants, husband and wife, are sued upon their indorsements of a renewal note for $14,-027.58, given on May 18, 1932, and payable July 18, 1932, to the order of the plaintiff. The maker was a corporation called C. B. Yule & Sons, Inc., engaged in the garage business, and owned and operated by the father and brothers of the female defendant.
After the introduction of the note, the plaintiff rested. Evidence for the defendants showed that their signatures to the original note, dated December 15, 1930, of which the note sued on was the last of a series of renewals, were obtained under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salem Trust Co. v. DeeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Reed v. A. E. Little Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Starks v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Prudential Trust Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Rice v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Lamson & Co. v. AbramsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.