Taylor v. Terry
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. „ The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action for unlawful detainer. The plaintiff recovered judgment, from which the defendant appealed, and the case comes here on the judgment roll.
It appears from the findings that on the first day of October, 1884, the plaintiff leased to the defendant, by verbal lease, the land in question for the term of one year, commencing on the first day of October, 1884, and ending on the first day of October, 1885; that on the sixth day of August, 1885, the plaintiff again, by verbal lease, leased the land to the defendant for the term of one year, to commence the first day of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Becar v. . FluesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Young v. . DakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Wolf v. DozerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Atwood v. NortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Pulse v. HamerOregon Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Lang v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lasky v. BewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Hull v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.