Pulse v. Hamer
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Benton County. This is an action to recover one thousand four hundred and eight dollars for the non-performance of a verbal contract for the leasing of certain premises. The terms of the contract are shown in the testimony recited in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Boise, J.:
To prove the contract as set up by the plaintiff in his complaint, the plaintiff offers himself as a witness and testifies as follows:
Question 2. “State the terms of the contract between you and the defendant, Mr. Hamer, in regard to the lease of his ranch mentioned and described in your complaint."
Answer. “ In the spring of 1877, or rather in the summer, I had been informed that Mr. Hamer had a place to lease, and I went to see him some time the first of July—do not recollect the day and date. Mr. Rust informed me that Mr. Hamer had this place to lease, and stock, and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Dechenbach v. RimaOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Jenning v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Wickson v. Monarch Cycle Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Dodge v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Taylor v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.