Hull v. Morris
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Commissioners’ Opinion, Division No. 3. Action by H. O. Morris against J. L. Hull and others. From the judgment, Hull brings ern i'.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, .
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Atoka county, rendered on November 9, 1920. The plaintiff in error, J. L. Hull, with R. A. Price, Jr., A. Neely, and F. P. Semple, were defendants, and defendant in error H. C. Morris, was plaintiff.
The plaintiff in bringing his suit made F. P. Semple a party defendant and in the progress of the ■ case the interest of the plaintiff decreased until he claimed nothing, and the interest of F. P. Semple increased until he claimed all the interest, and at the time the judgment was rendered the con-trovjersy wlas…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Young v. . DakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Brown v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Carden v. HumbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hudson v. HildtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Worrell v. GravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Flynt v. HastingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Chesnut v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Hull v. SempleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924