Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Neisner Bros.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1950No. 3289PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

In this diversity action plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages for alleged breach of a written lease. Defendant moves to dismiss, asserting failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

In the absence of anything to the contrary, we assume defendant drew the lease and that all operative facts occurred in Pennsylvania. We look to that law to determine the substantive rights and obligations of the parties 1 and to decide questions of interpretation and construction of the lease. 2 We do not write on a clean slate. We must act, in effect, as another…

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Lois J. Newman (Formerly Lois J. Senderman) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. MessierDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Sinchak v. ParenteDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. St. Louis Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. WitneyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API