Wolf v. Dozer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Allen District Court. At the June Term, 1878, of, the district court, Dozer, as defendant, had judgment against Wolf, as plaintiff, who brings the case here. All necessary facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
The facts of this case are substantially as follows: In August, 1877, the defendant in error was in the possession of certain farm lands belonging to the plaintiff in error, under a lease to expire March 1,1878. Soon after the last-named date, plaintiff brought his action of forcible entry and detainer against the defendant. As his defense, the defendant claimed and offered evidence against objections of plaintiff, that about August 15, 1877, plaintiff made a verbal contract to rent to him the premises another year, beginning March 1,…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Bard v. ElstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Osborne v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Wickson v. Monarch Cycle Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Jellett v. RhodeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Taylor v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.