Legal Opinion

Oswalt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 17, 2008No. 97-733CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

FUTEY, Judge.

This breach of contract case is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs A. Dean and Reinie Oswalt, Craig and Michelle Oswalt, and Kirk and Stacie Oswalt (collectively, “plaintiffs”), allege in their Renewed Motion For Summary Judgment1 that plaintiffs had contracted with defendant for the provision of irrigation water to seven allotments of land leased by plaintiffs from the government. Plaintiffs further allege that defendant breached those contracts by failing to provide irrigation water to plaintiffs from June 10, 1994…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. James v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Longnecker Property v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API