Legal Opinion
Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 19, 1954No. Civ. 1415, 1653PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOLDT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the Arvidson case operate fourteen farms in Clark County, Washington. Their complaint filed in December, 1950 seeks damages and injunctive relief against defendant because of alleged damage to lands and cattle claimed to have been caused by fluorides discharged from defendant’s aluminum plant at Troutdale, Oregon. The Whiteaker complaint was filed in November, 1952 by plaintiffs operating four farms in Cowlitz County, Washington seeking the same relief under similar allegations relating to the operation of defendant’s aluminum plant at Longview, Washington.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Suter v. Wenatchee Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
- Northern Grain & Warehouse Co. v. HolstWashington Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Fairview Farms, Inc. v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959
- Stockdale v. Agrico Chemical Co., Div. of Con. Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
- Ellison v. Rayonier IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1957
- Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956