Legal Opinion

Northern Grain & Warehouse Co. v. Holst

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1917No. 13768PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered March 20, 1916, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action for damages.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, J. —

It is sought in this action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by the appellant because of the failure of certain of the respondents to perform certain official duties. The respondent Holst is a former chief inspector of the state grain department. Respondents Wilson, Lee and Jones are former members of the public service commission. Respondents surety companies were sureties upon the official bonds of these officials. The case below was heard upon a demurrer to the amended complaint, which the lower court sustained. Appellant electing to stand upon its complaint,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  3. Spokane County v. PrescottWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Suter v. Wenatchee Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Quaker City National Bank v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stenberg v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Luellen v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lewis v. Lockheed Shipbuilding & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API