Ellison v. Rayonier Incorporated
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
BOLDT, District Judge.
In seventeen actions, of which the captioned case is typical, plaintiffs seek to recover damages for loss allegedly sustained by reason of water pollution resulting from the operation of defendant’s pulp and cellulose mill at or near Shelton, Thurston County, Washington. Plaintiffs’ properties include tidelands in the state waters of Puget Sound at varying distances up to several miles from defendant’s plant from which an effluence of chemicals, unreclaimed wood products, and other waste materials is discharged into state waters of the Sound. The complaints allege the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- White Lake Improvement Ass'n v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Tiegs v. WattsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Commerce Oil Refining Corporation v. MinerDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.