Legal Opinion
Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1956No. 14734_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn,
The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash.1954, 125 F.Supp. 481;
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Stockdale v. Agrico Chemical Co., Div. of Con. Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972
- Ellison v. Rayonier IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1957
- Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014