Chiaia v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the defendant’s absence control policy,1 as applied to the plaintiffs who had sustained injuries compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Act,2 is a per se violation of General Statutes § 31-290a (a)3 when that statute forbids any discrimination or retaliatory discharge for filing a claim or exercising any rights under the act.
Both plaintiffs were employed by the defendant and each sustained work related injuries, filed workers’ compensation claims and were terminated pursuant to company policy solely because they did not return to work within…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Christine Baldracchi v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division, United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Vergie Swearingen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Hess v. Clarcor, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Erisoty v. Merrow Machine Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.