Bossak v. National Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Finch, J.:
Plaintiffs, as copartners, are suing the two defendants upon policies of insurance issued by them, covering the same goods, for a loss of said goods by a burglary. The policies are separate, but each of the defendants is liable only pro rata for the loss.
Section 211 of the Civil Practice Act provides as follows: “All persons may be joined as defendants against whom the right to any relief is alleged to exist, whether jointly, severally or in the alternative; and judgment may be given against such one or more of the defendants as may be found to be liable, according to their…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HubbardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Borden CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Stern v. George P. Ide & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Broderick v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- Munson Inland Lines, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.