Legal Opinion

Bossak v. National Surety Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

Plaintiffs, as copartners, are suing the two defendants upon policies of insurance issued by them, covering the same goods, for a loss of said goods by a burglary. The policies are separate, but each of the defendants is liable only pro rata for the loss.

Section 211 of the Civil Practice Act provides as follows: “All persons may be joined as defendants against whom the right to any relief is alleged to exist, whether jointly, severally or in the alternative; and judgment may be given against such one or more of the defendants as may be found to be liable, according to their…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HubbardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  2. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Borden CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. Stern v. George P. Ide & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Broderick v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Munson Inland Lines, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API