Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Marcus
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
The action is one by the Superintendent of Banks pursuant to section 81 of the Banking Law and sections 60 and 61 of the General Corporation Law against various members of the board of directors of the Bank of United States. The Superintendent complains of the general conduct and management on the part of the defendants extending over a number of years, resulting it is alleged in the ultimate insolvency of the bank. In *242brief, the relief demanded is for an accounting and for damages resulting from the alleged negligent and illegal conduct of the defendants as directors.
The motion is by a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- O'Brien v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- People v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Dykman v. . KeeneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Higgins v. TefftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Broomfield v. DoolittleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Melniker v. American Title & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Ripperger v. AllynDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Leech v. FullerNew York Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.