Legal Opinion

United States v. Cleveland

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided April 18, 1997No. Criminal Action 96-207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Defendant Bankston’s Motion to Suppress Results of Electronic Surveillance and All Evidence Derived from. Such Results and for an Evidentiary Hearing and Denying Defendant Bankston’s Motion for Appropriate Relief

VANCE, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendant Bankston’s motion to suppress results of electronic surveillance and all evidence derived from such results and for an evidentiary hearing, which has been adopted by defendants Carl Cleveland, Fred Goodson, Maria Goodson, and Joe Morgan and defendant Bankston’s motion for appropriate relief, requesting production of a…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. SuggsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2000
  3. United States v. SantiagoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. United States v. OlmedoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  5. United States v. BarnesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API