Legal Opinion
United States v. Olmedo
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 28, 2008No. 07-20759-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Denying Motions to Suppress
ADALBERTO JORDAN, District Judge.
Following oral argument, and upon a de novo review of the record, including the objections filed by Ricardo Olmedo [D.E. 472, 477], I adopt the thorough and well-reasoned reports issued by Magistrate Judge Torres [D.E. 441, 452], Accordingly, Mr. Olmedo’s motion to suppress the fruits of an illegal search and seizure [D.E. 320], and motion to suppress wiretap evidence and for a Franks hearing [D.E. 321], are DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT RICARDO OL-MEDO’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS FRUITS OF ILLEGAL…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Rodriguez-AlejandroDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009
- United States v. DegauleDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011