Morgan Motor & Finance Co. v. Oliver
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, Justice.
This action was originally commenced in the City Court of Salt Lake City by appellant seeking the possession of a certain automobile sold to respondent under a conditional sales contract. Respondent cross-complained alleging the contract to be usurious and hence void by virtue of Section 44-0-2, R. S. U. 1933, as amended by Chapter 42, Laws of Utah 1935; that he was entitled to a return of all moneys paid under said contract under the provisions of Section 44-0-7, R. S. U. 1933.
From a finding on all the issues in favor of appellant, respondent appealed to the district…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Edler v. EdwardsUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Sayler v. BradyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Petersen v. Philco Finance CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Mathis v. Holland Furnace Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944