Legal Opinion

Sayler v. Brady

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1933No. File No. 6176PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nuessle, Ch. J.

The plaintiff in this case seeks to rescind a contract for the purchase of an automobile and to recover that part of the consideration paid by him.

The case was tried to the court without a jury. The facts are stipulated. From this stipulation it appears that the defendant was engaged in the business of selling- automobiles in the city of Fargo. On March 11, 1933, he entered into a written contract under which he agreed to sell and the plaintiff agreed to buy a 1933 Model Studebaker Six Kegal Sedan at a price of $1,250. At the time this contract was entered into the plaintiff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commercial Credit Co. v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Goodsill v. WoodmanseeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex rel. Kol v. North Dakota Children's Home SocietyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Powers Elevator Co. v. PottnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Standish v. NomlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mathis v. Holland Furnace Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Morgan Motor & Finance Co. v. OliverUtah Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API