United States v. Gladdis
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
GARN, Judge:
The Court of Military Appeals remanded this case to this Court for consideration of an issue raised by the appellant, for the first time, before that Court. The issue, as framed by the appellant, and now assigned as “error” before this Court, is:
WHETHER THE COURT-MARTIAL LACKED JURISDICTION OVER CHARGE II AND ITS SPECIFICATIONS (WRONGFUL POSSESSION AND USE OF HEROIN) BECAUSE THE APPELLANT HAD RECEIVED REGULATORY EXEMPTION FROM PROSECUTION.
The appellant argues that the court-martial lacked jurisdiction to try him for the use and possession…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. JosephUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. KirschUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. HaynesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. GladdisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. GoodsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. MikaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984