United States v. Haynes
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
HomeR Ferguson, Judge:
Notwithstanding his plea of not guilty, the accused was found guilty of two offenses of conspiracy to commit extortion and one offense each of sodomy, extortion, and attempt to commit sodomy, in violation of Articles 81, 125, 127, and 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881, 925, 927, and 880, respectively. Intermediate appellate bodies have affirmed.
The bulk of the prosecution’s case *794rested upon the testimony of witnesses, co-actors with the accused in the offenses charged, who were armed with letters of immunity. In his opening…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. LonetreeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AskewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. CaliendoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. HerbergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.