Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Walton

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1963No. Civ. 10381PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiffs, John Raymond McCarty and Helen McCarty, filed an action to quiet title to an easement over the land of defendant and for a mandatory injunction requiring defendant to remove certain obstructions placed by her on the road in question and also for damages caused by the barricading of such road. The trial court found that “at the time that plaintiffs purchased said real property from defendant's predecessor in interest, a right of way over said roadway was granted by implication to plaintiffs for use thereof as appurtenant to the real property described above; and plaintiffs have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wall v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Crimmins v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Johnstone v. BettencourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Navarro v. PaulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Buechner v. JonasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Lyman Grazing Association v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API