Legal Opinion
Johnstone v. Bettencourt
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1961No. Civ. 9966PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Plaintiffs Lois M. and James A. Johnstone appeal from an adverse judgment in an action brought by them to quiet title in an easement, to enjoin obstructions of said easement and to abate a nuisance.
By their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that they were the owners of Lot 94 in a subdivision bordering Clear Lake, known as Lake Shore Park; that defendants George A. and Ethel Bettencourt were the owners of adjoining Lots 95, 96, and 97 in the same subdivision; that they (the plaintiffs) were also owners of a right-of-way of easement across defendants’ property, known as Yerba Santa Road and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Back v. FarnsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Krupp v. MullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Vargas v. MaderosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Zunino v. GabrielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Baker v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- McCarty v. WaltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Shader v. Hampton Improvement Ass'n.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- College Book Centers, Inc. v. Carefree Foothills Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.