Legal Opinion
Ponder v. Stone
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided November 29, 2000No. NMCM 200001320PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEO, Senior Judge:
On 17 August 2000, the petitioner submitted a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus and a stay of the proceedings below. The petitioner alleges that the military judge erred (1) by declaring, as a matter of law, that an order to receive the anthrax vaccination was lawful, (2) by granting the Government’s motion to bar the petitioner from presenting any evidence before the court-martial members on the safety, efficacy, and necessity of the anthrax vaccine, and (3) by denying the petitioner’s several motions relating to the lawfulness of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fisher v. Commander, Army Regional Confinement FacilityNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- Shadwell v. DavenportNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- Taylor v. GaraffaNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. SalahuddinUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. ToyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.