Legal Opinion
Clinton v. Goldsmith
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 17, 1999No. 98-347PublishedCited by 301 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter
The challenge here is to the use of the All Writs Act, 28 U. S. C. § 1651(a), by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, to enjoin the President and various military officials from dropping respondent from the rolls of the Air Force. Because that court’s process was neither “in aid of” its strictly circumscribed jurisdiction to review court-martial findings and sentences under 10 U. S. C. §867 nor “necessary or appropriate” in light of a servieemember’s alternative opportunities to seek relief, we hold that the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces lacked jurisdiction to issue the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania Bureau of Correction v. United States Marshals ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by301 opinions
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Al Otro Lado v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ricardo Lopez-Marroquin v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
296 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.