Taylor v. Garaffa
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER, Senior Judge:
Petitioner has submitted a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. He contends that the Respondent military judge improperly denied his motion to limit the jurisdiction of his special court-martial to impose punishment. Since he allegedly committed the charged offense prior to 15 May 2002, he claims that Rule for Courts-Martial 201(f)(2)(B)(i), Manual for Courts-Martial, United States (2000 ed.), as that rule existed prior to the 2002 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, as prescribed by Exec. Order No. 13262, 3 C.F.R.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WallaceNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003