United States v. Toy
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Judge:
The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of one specification of forcible sodomy with a child between 12 and 16 years old, one specification of sodomy with a child between 12 and 16 years old, and five specifications of committing indecent acts with another (three specifications with a child *600under the age of 16 years), all with the same step-daughter-victim. The appellant’s crimes violated Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Harris v. ChampionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Arthur MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. McElhaneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. ToyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008