United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Presiding Judge
The case at bar involves three importations of merchandise variously entered as “pencil leads” and “slide rules.” The “slide rules” are admitted, by the protest in entry No. N-70791, to have been properly classified, and in that respect the judgment of the court below is affirmed. The official samples show the leads to be of three-kinds, black, blue, and red. These leads are all of the same size, namely, approximately 3% inches in length and seven thirty-seconds of an inch in diameter; they are, admittedly, each more than six one-hundredths of an inch in diameter. Each lead is cylindrical,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Bata Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Katz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Pavel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.