Legal Opinion

United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 29, 1929No. 3105PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, Presiding Judge

The case at bar involves three importations of merchandise variously entered as “pencil leads” and “slide rules.” The “slide rules” are admitted, by the protest in entry No. N-70791, to have been properly classified, and in that respect the judgment of the court below is affirmed. The official samples show the leads to be of three-kinds, black, blue, and red. These leads are all of the same size, namely, approximately 3% inches in length and seven thirty-seconds of an inch in diameter; they are, admittedly, each more than six one-hundredths of an inch in diameter. Each lead is cylindrical,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Bakelite Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. United States v. DunhillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sardik, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. Bata Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Katz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  5. Pavel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API