Legal Opinion

State v. Jackman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1998No. 95-1996; CA A93248PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

The state appeals from a judgment sentencing defendant to 60 months’ imprisonment for the crime of second-degree robbery pursuant to ORS 161.610, which provides for minimum sentences when a firearm is used. The state asserts that the sentencing court erred in failing to impose the 70-month mandatory minimum for the crime of second-degree robbery required by ORS 137.700(2)(a)(R). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for resentencing under ORS 137.700.

ORS 137.700, popularly known as Ballot Measure 11 (1994), provides that a mandatory minimum sentence of 70 months be imposed on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. AlbrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API