State v. Jackman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
The state appeals from a judgment sentencing defendant to 60 months’ imprisonment for the crime of second-degree robbery pursuant to ORS 161.610, which provides for minimum sentences when a firearm is used. The state asserts that the sentencing court erred in failing to impose the 70-month mandatory minimum for the crime of second-degree robbery required by ORS 137.700(2)(a)(R). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for resentencing under ORS 137.700.
ORS 137.700, popularly known as Ballot Measure 11 (1994), provides that a mandatory minimum sentence of 70 months be imposed on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Macartney v. ShipherdOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. AlbrichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.