Legal Opinion

Miller v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1994No. 93-987PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The time has arrived for this court to revisit the holding in Colvin, supra, 69 Ohio St.2d 293,23 O.O.3d 281,432 N.E.2d 167. In that case, an insured was injured as a result of a collision with an uninsured motorist. The insured’s policy provided uninsured motorist coverage. That coverage contained a provision requiring that any dispute between the insured and his insurance carrier be submitted to arbitration. However, the right to arbitration was limited by the following provision:

“ ‘Action Against the Company: No suit or action whatsoever or any proceeding instituted or processed in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kraly v. VannewkirkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Colvin v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Duriak v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Ohayon v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tricia Miller, of the Estate of Rhonda Bishop v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Mastellone v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2008

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API