Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1973No. 72-390PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the coverage afforded by the policy issued by appellant to appellee met the requirements of R. C. 3937.18.
R. C.. 3937.18 provides:
“No automobile * * * policy of insurance * * * shall be * * * issued * * * unless coverage is provided therein * * * in limits for bodily injury or death set forth in Section 4509.20 of the Revised Code, under provisions approved by the Superintendent of Insurance, for the protection of * * * [victims of uninsured motorists].”
Section 4509.20, as in effect at the time of the collision, read:
*52“(A) A policy # * * does…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Pryor v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Karabin v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Kish v. Central National Insurance GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.