Legal Opinion
Naseef v. Cord, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided December 5, 1966PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*319The opinion of the court was delivered by
Schettino, J.
This is a workmen’s compensation case involving a cab company and one of its drivers. It is a sequel to Hannigan v. Goldfarb, 53 N. J. Super. 190 (App. Div. 1958), which held a taxicab leasing arrangement, almost identical to the one involved here, to be an “employment” for the purposes of the Workmen’s Compensation Act and, hence, the owner of a cab was held liable to the employee for compensation benefits under the act.
Petitioner’s husband, Michael Naseef, died as a result of injuries sustained while operating a taxicab owned by Cord,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Hawkins v. BleaklySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LiebSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3Cited by37 opinions
- Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- American Postal Workers Union Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail Center, Richmond, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Bryant v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.