John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Lieb
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This writ of certiorari brings up an award in favor of a petitioner in a workmen’s compensation ease, the prosecutor being the employer. The only question for determination is the sufficiency of a notice served by the prosecutor on its employes, including the respondent Lieb, for the purpose of putting an end to its liability under section (or division) 2 of the Compensation act, entitled "elective compensation.”
The petitioner had been employed by the prosecutor as an outside insurance agent collecting his premiums in the usual manner. This employment had been on the basis of a tacit…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Naseef v. Cord, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
- Naseef v. Cord, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Britten v. Berger, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1940
- Eaton v. Joe N. Miles & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
- Licata v. LutzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.