Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Central Jersey Landscaping, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 2008No. A-34 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

In this matter, we consider four consolidated appeals that raise the question of whether the Legislature’s 2004 amendment to the schedule of workers’ compensation death benefits was intended to be applied retroactively. In two of these matters, the Workers’ Compensation judge concluded that the amendment was entitled to prospective application only, with the result that both of those claimants were denied an increase in benefits, which they sought to be calculated from the effective date of the amendment. In the other two matters, a different Workers’ Compensation judge reached the opposite…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Estate of Myroslava Kotsovska v. Saul Liebman (073861)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
  3. Ardan v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  4. Nowell James v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company (071344)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Van Dunk v. Reckson Associates Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API