Legal Opinion

Brown v. Poston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1954No. 32716PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

— This action was brought by the plastering subcontractor against the general contractor to recover the difference in cost between the metal lath the former was required to use and the gypsum or rock lath which he asserted his subcontract would, have permitted him to use on the ceilings of certain classrooms in a school building being erected by the general contractor. After trial, the action was dismissed, and this appeal followed.

The trial court found:

“That looking at both the plans and specifications there is a requirement for the use of channel suspended metal lath in the construction of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Vance v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Durand v. HeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Kieburtz v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Keeter v. John Griffith, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armstrong Construction Co. v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ecorp, Inc. v. RooksbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Sons of Norway v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Santos v. SinclairCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API