Legal Opinion
Sons of Norway v. Boomer
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 19, 1974No. 787-3PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a defense verdict and judgment in an action against defendants for unlawful detainer.
On March 10, 1972, plaintiff, as lessor, and defendants as lessees, entered into a 3-year commercial property lease, which in pertinent part provided:
Business Purpose
2. The premises are to be used for the purpose of conducting therein an Arcade composed of “Pool Tables,” “Game Machine” and similar devices expressley for public entertainment and for no other business or purpose, without the written consent of Lessor.
Signs
18. All signs or symbols placed in the windows or door of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Ladum v. Utility Cartage, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Hartman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christensen v. MunsenWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Barnes v. TreeceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Pine Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Harris-Dudley Plumbing Co. v. Professional United World Travel Ass'n (WTA), Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.