Legal Opinion

Keeter v. John Griffith, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. 31926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

This action was brought by respondent to recover a judgment for the value of pears sold and delivered to appellant pursuant to the terms of a written contract. A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict for respondent.

The respondent grew a crop of pears in 1950. The appellant was engaged in the business of buying fruit for itself for resale and also for others. It does not appear that appellant was a selling broker or a commission merchant.

At the commencement of the trial, respondent offered, and the court received in evidence, without objection, three contracts made by the use of printed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Durand v. HeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Stusser v. GottsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Interstate Engineering Co. v. ArcherWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Murray v. Western Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. Forrester v. CraddockWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hull v. Enger Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API