Bailey v. Dale
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. The facts are stated in the head-notes and opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This action was brought by the plaintiff as road overseer of a road district in Stanislaus County, to abate a nuisance caused by the obstruction of a public highway in his district, and to recover the sum *36óf ten dollars for every day the nuisance remained after notice to remove it.
The defendants demurred to the complaint, upon the ground,—1. That the action was improperly brought in the name of the road overseer; 2. That the complaint was ambiguous and uncertain in the description of the alleged highway; and 3. That several causes of action were improperly united, and not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rollins v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- San Benito County v. WhitesidesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- Tevis v. HicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Syfert v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hall v. KauffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- County of Sierra v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.